Development of Spring and Winter Malting Barleys for the Intermountain west
Gongshe Hu
USDA-ARS
National Small Grains Research Facility
Aberdeen, ID 83210
The Aberdeen barley breeding program have completed all the breeding goal in terms of advancing all the materials, evaluation on all the nurseries in the same locations as before, and utilization of New Zealand winter nursery for extra growing season. New crosses were made across malt barley, special trait barley et al. we kept all the collaborations with other breeding and disease evaluation programs.
Major results in 2024:
- Spring malting barley lines of 16ARS067-13 and 11ARS183-9 passed AMBA pilot scale test and eligible for plant scale test.
- Winter malting barley line of 11ARS652-7 and 13ARS537-19 also passed AMBA polit scale test and eligible for plant scale test.
- The winter line of 11ARS652-7 is under consideration for releasing as a malt and feed dual-use variety because of its excellent yield potential.
- Winter food barley elite lines were planted about 1000 acres by Scoular for final large-scale evaluation to make the decision whether they will meet the company’s request in commercial use.
Detailed Report on Objectives, Methodology and Results
1). The winter line of 11ARS652-7 passed AMBA pilot scale test. It showed significantly better yield than all the winter variety checks (Table 1 and Table 2). With good test weight and lodging resistance.
3). Some special trait elite lines are promising in the preliminary tests. Those include NO-GN, Lox-free, and Hulless malting (Table 3).
4). Winter food barley elite lines of 12ARS777-1 and 12ARS777-2 still hold advantage of high beta-glucan (8-10%) and high protein (14-16) with good winter survival rate. The yield testing from more recent year 2023-2024 season showed comparable yield to Buck and Upspring (Table 4).
Table 1. Agronomic performance of winter malting lines with checks from Idaho locations 2016-2021.
| Line |
Yield
(Bu/A) |
Test
Weight
(Lbs/Bu) |
Head
(Julian) |
Height
(In) |
Lodge
(0-9) |
Winter
Survival
(%) |
| Locations: |
16 |
16 |
9 |
16 |
16 |
8 |
| Charles |
135.5 d |
50.7 d |
148.2 |
32.6 c |
1.5 a |
85.7 a |
| Endeavor |
136.2 d |
52.5 b |
151.1 |
36.9 a |
1.8 a |
80.6 b |
| Lightning |
138.5 c |
51.9 c |
146.4 |
32.2 d |
1.9 a |
87.9 a |
| Thunder |
147.8 b |
52.2 b |
148.3 |
32.2 d |
1.1 a |
86.7 a |
| Wintmalt |
145.4 c |
51.5 c |
152.0 |
35.2 b |
0.7 b |
90.7 a |
| 11ARS652-7 |
165.6a |
53.3 a |
150.5 |
37.5 a |
0.7 b |
91.9 a |
| 13ARS526-8 |
156.0b |
53.4 a |
149.1 |
32.4 c |
1.0 a |
89.8 a |
| Grand Mean |
147.9 |
52.4 |
149.3 |
34.0 |
1.2 |
87.9 |
| LSD(α=0.05) |
9.1 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
8.5 |
| C.V. |
8.7 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
5.4 |
111.2 |
9.6 |
- Values with the same letter are statistically the same. Lodging scale: 0=no lodging, 9=100% lodging.
Table 2. Additional field evaluation data 2023-2024.
| Line |
Yield |
| ABS |
AB |
HAZ |
KIM |
mean |
| Charles |
130.6 |
171.9 |
99.7 |
202.6 |
151.2 |
| Endeavor |
104.4 |
162.7 |
85.7 |
205.2 |
139.5 |
| Lightning |
116.7 |
151.8 |
95.1 |
192.4 |
139.0 |
| Thunder |
97.8 |
164.9 |
119.5 |
197.7 |
145.0 |
| Wintmalt |
104.4 |
154.9 |
92.7 |
198.6 |
137.7 |
| 11ARS652-7 |
139.3 |
189.3 |
111.1 |
216.4 |
164.0 |
| 13ARS526-8 |
125.1 |
194.7 |
103.8 |
218.8 |
160.6 |
Table 3. Specialty elite lines in the breeding program.
| Line |
Specialty
Trait |
Yield
(irrigated) |
Head |
Height |
Lodge |
TWT |
| Loc# |
|
6 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
| 12ARS033-5 |
Lox-free |
131.2 |
168.8 |
36.7 |
1.9 |
52.1 |
| 18ARS117-16 |
NO-GN |
136.5 |
168.2 |
29.7 |
0.3 |
52.3 |
| 18ARS117-46 |
NO-GN |
128.6 |
168.9 |
28.6 |
1.2 |
52.0 |
| 17ARS109-6 |
Hulless |
107.2 |
171.2 |
35.9 |
1.7 |
57.4 |
| 12ARS034-6 |
Lox-free |
126.6 |
168.6 |
39.8 |
4.2 |
51.5 |
| ABI Eagle |
check |
140.0 |
168.9 |
34.2 |
1.5 |
51.2 |
| ABI Voyager |
check |
133.6 |
168.3 |
35.7 |
2.3 |
51.4 |
| AC Metcalfe |
check |
124.7 |
168.4 |
37.5 |
3.3 |
52.1 |
| CDC Copeland |
check |
134.4 |
169.7 |
37.8 |
2.5 |
52.5 |
| M179 |
check |
131.6 |
170.9 |
30.0 |
0.2 |
50.9 |
| M69 |
check |
134.5 |
171.6 |
32.3 |
1.8 |
49.9 |
| MERIT 57 |
check |
131.3 |
169.8 |
36.3 |
2.3 |
50.3 |
Table 4. Yield data for winter food barley elite lines from four locations in 2023-2024 season.
| Line |
Heading date
(Julian) |
Plant height
(in) |
Lodge
(0-9) |
Yield
(Bu/A) |
Protein
(%) |
Beta-glucan
(%) |
| Buck |
145 |
23 |
3 |
124 |
12.7 |
4.5 |
| Upspring |
146 |
21 |
1 |
105 |
14.5 |
7.4 |
| 12ARS777-1 |
145 |
21 |
3 |
115 |
14.1 |
7.7 |
| 12ARS777-2 |
144 |
38 |
2 |
123 |
15.1 |
7.8 |
Project Personnel: Hu Gongshe, Chris Evans, Sherry Ellberg, and Kathy Satterfield.
PROJECT TITLE
Evaluating the performance of specialty inputs on malt barley in the Palouse
PRIMARY PERSONNEL
Megan Townsend megan@cropmatters.com PO Box 554
Crop Matters LLC (559) 907-8729 Potlatch ID 83855
www.cropmatters.com
JUSTIFICATION/RATIONALE
In recent years, much industry advancement and interest has revolved around biostimulant products. A widely-accepted definition of biostimulants is as follows: “substances and/or microorganisms whose function when applied to plants or the rhizosphere is to stimulate natural processes to benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency tolerance to abiotic stress, and/or crop quality, independently of its nutrient content.” Biostimulants incorporate a wide range of product types, including: humic and fulvic acids, amino acids, seaweed and plant extracts, beneficial bacteria and fungi, proteins, and enzymes. Some cropping systems have integrated biostimulants into their standard practices. Much of the product technology is new, however, and has rarely, if ever, been applied to dryland barley production.
OBJECTIVES
This study will have two main objectives: (1) evaluate multiple fertility, plant growth regulators, biostimulants, and biological products on yield and quality and (2) evaluate plant growth regulators, calcium, and silica on lodging, yield, and quality.
METHODS/PLAN OF WORK
Crop Matters will establish a trial in conventional malt barley in the Palouse region of Idaho. Twenty-four treatments will be replicated six times in 5’ by 20’ plots arranged in a split-block randomized complete block design:
ANTICIPATED BENEFITS/EXPECTED OUTCOMES
Upon conclusion of this work, barley growers will have a strong and unbiased data set. They will be able to evaluate biostimulant, biological, PGR, and specialty fertility product categories in general, and will also have information on specific available products. The conclusions of this research will help growers make the economic decision of whether to invest in these additional products. This trial may also help growers to decide which product to use, and which application method/timing is most suitable.
.